|
Targets
Feb 16, 2006 7:00:57 GMT -5
Post by BT on Feb 16, 2006 7:00:57 GMT -5
Its just my opinion that the Rhinehart that I have been shooting for the last year is the best investment I have made as far as a transportable target. I have just been ploking the heck out of this thing and it really doesn't seem to care ;D I got the big ball and I think it went for near $100. at the time . Although that seemed nuts at the time...I see the value now The Pro Bag is probably the only target I have seen that is better in terms of longevity but it cannot be used for broadheads without fast/permanent damage to itself. When shooting the Rhinehart 100 last year it was great to be able to pull my arrows and move along without putting my bow down I also got the feeding deer target with the internals insert. Thats a great target too. the underside is very thin and therefore doesn't get cut out like all other targets. You know what I am saying when referring to this?. I am saying that after you shoot others targets over a prolonged time,the underside (Chest) gets chewed away to the point of where it wont hold and insertable core anymore. This does not look as if it will be a problem with the Rhinehart. Bottom line is that I think they are a great product and I would suggest making one of the less expensive models a consideration when looking for your next target
|
|
|
Targets
Feb 23, 2006 3:29:39 GMT -5
Post by michihunter on Feb 23, 2006 3:29:39 GMT -5
For broadheads, this is the best is by far the best target I've owned. For fieldpoints, I'm torn between severaql of the Morrell bag targets, but I like the Range bag for it's size.
|
|
|
Targets
Feb 23, 2006 6:58:53 GMT -5
Post by BT on Feb 23, 2006 6:58:53 GMT -5
Got to say that the bag is the best value I have seen.
I have had one for probably 10 years and only replaced the bag twice and both times due to the fact that I had to have a broadhead backstop.
|
|
|
Targets
Feb 24, 2006 20:42:14 GMT -5
Post by teambateau on Feb 24, 2006 20:42:14 GMT -5
This is the one I picked up today, it is so easy to pull them out. I got it for $34.99
|
|
|
Targets
Feb 24, 2006 20:50:50 GMT -5
Post by BT on Feb 24, 2006 20:50:50 GMT -5
Good deal! is that a 2X2 ?
|
|
|
Targets
Feb 24, 2006 22:31:50 GMT -5
Post by michihunter on Feb 24, 2006 22:31:50 GMT -5
This is the one I picked up today, it is so easy to pull them out. I got it for $34.99 You're gonna love it James!! But only for field points. Get you a Yellow Jacket for broadheads!!
|
|
|
Targets
Feb 24, 2006 23:25:29 GMT -5
Post by teambateau on Feb 24, 2006 23:25:29 GMT -5
Yes, it's a 2x2, I had similar one 8 years ago and I liked it.
|
|
|
Targets
Mar 13, 2006 21:38:08 GMT -5
Post by buffalocounty32 on Mar 13, 2006 21:38:08 GMT -5
I use the yellow jacket for broadheads, cannot go wrong for $40 for field points I make my own targets out of feed bags from work(shhhh...lol) i stuff a feed bag with more feed bags, the arrows only go in about 3-4in. i have made 4 of them and each only cost me about 5min of my time, I can literally pull the arrows out with my teeth and these things are long outlasting my block.....so i wont need any field point targets for a long time
|
|
|
Targets
Mar 19, 2006 15:01:24 GMT -5
Post by brandonhavis on Mar 19, 2006 15:01:24 GMT -5
i use a morrells six shooter, i think its 2x2x2, shoot all six sides with broadheads and 4 of them can be shot with field points.... i like it but im about to get me a bag target for my field tips cause they are so much easier to pull out.
brandon
|
|
|
Targets
Mar 21, 2006 7:17:15 GMT -5
Post by 2chucks2 on Mar 21, 2006 7:17:15 GMT -5
nothing fancy but I take blue insulation foam and make a cube that is 2 feet square. I bind everything together with duct tape. For close shooting I fill an onion bag with empty plastiv grocery bags to slow them down even more. This target works with broadheads and practice points. My outdoors target is white styrofoam and is 3 feet wide by 4 feet all and 18 inches deep.
|
|