But you know what?... there are people being educated today from these T.V. Pro's because they have nobody else to guide them. This is my problem with the direction of hunting today.
Deer hunting has become a sport and hunting does not have any roots in sport. It can be but when you set the wrong goals in order to rate success... you taint the act of hunting.
Here is what I am saying....
1970's (40 years ago) The stated goal of Bowhunting hunting was to enjoy the act of hunting by way of complicating the means of hunting, while having some expectation of success.
1980's (30 years ago) The stated goal of Bowhunting was to enjoy the act of hunting by increasing success rates in the field via Bow design improvements, equipment upgrades such as dial in range finders, custom camouflage, bow accessories, hand climber stands and improved broadhead design pertaining to penetration.
1990's (20 years ago) The stated goal for bowhunting was to increase success rates via upgrades to Arrow weight, Bow speed, Bow accessories, laser rangefinder, self climber stands, camouflage, scent control products, artificial food plots, Trail Camera's & improved broadhead design pertaining to flight.
Turn of the Century (10 years ago) the stated goal for Bowhunting was to eliminate any complication in order to succeed.
Beyond the gadgetry associated with bowhunting gear came other seemingly expected requirements such as land leasing and enacting QDM policies for the stated goal of harvesting horns as a means of gauging the success of the hunt.
Now when I say gauging success of the hunt I don't mean hunt because there is VERY little hunting going on when "Pro Hunters" such as the Drury Brothers set up to kill anything. Even if the sport was to find and kill a large Buck it still isn't hunting because you don't have to hunt for something you own and have cared for from birth to 5-6th birthday.
I guess in my mind the word hunting (as to it's true meaning) has been replaced with finding. I have never felt as if I had succeeded in finding anything... I just found it.
If my dog was missing I just went outside and looked for him till I found him. It wasn't like I didn't know he was there and it wasn't like he didn't know I was there. I just found him.
This differs greatly from what I feel when I hunt something and catch it. If I am hunting I am looking for a deer rather than a dog, I assume the deer is there but I do not know where it is, when I will see it or if I will even see it at all. To add to the act of hunting is the fact that what I am looking for does not know I am there (hopefully) and if it does... I never will know it was there before it is gone.
As to the equipment...
If I wanted to be assured of taking my deer home I would use a rifle and a 7mm most likely.
At 300 yards I don't have to worry about scent control, camouflage, tree stands or anything else. All I have to do is see, point and shoot. This is the reason I don't go deer hunting with a gun.... it's just not much of a challenge and I am too fat to need all that x-tra food.
As to a Bow... whatever the bow it is there is more of a challenge, namely getting closer... which necessitates some tricks I will admit. But when does the bow start becoming more of a gun?. I would say that deer hunting (in my mind) with a revolver is pretty sporting and therefore any bow that I use that matches the ability of a hand gun has the same quality of sport to it.
When my bow exceeds the performance of a hand gun then the sport declines as well.
Take this thought process to it's logical end and the most sporting comes back to where it is more about the person with the weapon than it is the weapon.
In the act of Trophy hunting, the only goal is to take a trophy come hell or high water and therefore everything that can be used is used and since trophy hunting is a sport.... the act of taking is the objective... not the act of hunting itself.
This focus on the end result rather than the method is what has labeled trophy hunting as a blood sport. In many peoples minds, it is trophy hunting (as it is intended by many members of A.M.M.O.) that brought about organizations such as PETA.
Organizations such as PETA are sitting back and keeping their powder dry (as they did in the 60's) and letting the hunting community make enough rope to hang themselves (as they did in the 70's) in the court of public opinion.
Airing hunting shows that focus only on the kill (for the sake of the trophy) where inhuman practises such as gut shooting are displayed and spoken about as an act to secure a kill (despite the suffering inflicted with such a shot) is the rope being built.
Lack of editing where spine shots are witnessed (without immediate follow up) while the shooter now stands back to a wounded animal and talks to the camera in cold blooded fashion is the rope being built.
Shooting a deer and then having to wait until the next day to recover that deer, in weather that would undoubtedly spoil anything other than horns or where coyotes will ruin the flesh is the rope being built.
Trophy Hunting is something like alcohol in my mind. Most people like to have a beer or three and feel that high but when the only reason you drink is to get high and beer just isn't getting it done anymore, you move on to the hard stuff.
When you cannot be satisfied with a high and must be ripped to feel anything.... you are going to become a problem to those around you.
My view is that most (not all) "Pro's" are hard liquor types who only get out of bed to take care of an urge.
If this is how the public perceives us as a group we are going to (once again) face civil up rise as a group.
In today's environment I don't want to have to fight for a cause that has nothing to do with me and I don't want to fight a cause because I am assumed to be in league with the enemy.... As viewed by a population that is made up of 90% non-hunters.
As a community we need to reevaluate where we are headed and who is leading the way. Lets not be lemmings running towards the cliff.