Post by BT on Mar 4, 2007 21:08:29 GMT -5
This is yet another pet peeve of mine but one that I just saw - again and for the umpteenth time
Aside from idiot guides making decisions based on idiotic clients from the past who couldnt shoot straight....what could be the thinking behind this so called common knowledge that you shouldn't hunt bears with expandables?
Here is the truth from my perspective.
There are a certain number of priority's that any hunter must face when hunting bear or any potentially dangerous game animal.
#1: The guides welfare comes first!
Assuming that you are using a guide , once that bear is hit , you are now in the rear and the guide is up front on the trail.
Why wouldn't you want that animal hit with the biggest head possible that will inflict the most significant damage possible?
I am a bit tired of the old saying that an expandable can fail
Hell!....I test fixed heads that fail far more in terms of percentages than those expandables which everyone tries to avoid like the plague
Whats the mind set here?
If an outfitter had a hair on his butt he would require that certain heads only be used and not types of heads.
That's what I am referring to when I say dumb ass outfitters
Here's what I am thinking
I am thinking that expandables are the said cure all for the inept and therefore they are used in larger number by said inept.
It is that lack of skill in large part and not the head that is the root cause of all these supposed wounds that get all the lip service.
I know a number of big outfitters who stand by their policy's and they will get all red faced and bent out of shape when I tell them this fact
But the anger is due to ignorance and a big dose of don't know Jack S... , which leaves them using examples of what they have seen as opposed to reasoning based on fact
Besides....it's not their butt crawling through the brush , follow a thin blood trail
Anyway.....Thanks for letting me vent
Aside from idiot guides making decisions based on idiotic clients from the past who couldnt shoot straight....what could be the thinking behind this so called common knowledge that you shouldn't hunt bears with expandables?
Here is the truth from my perspective.
There are a certain number of priority's that any hunter must face when hunting bear or any potentially dangerous game animal.
#1: The guides welfare comes first!
Assuming that you are using a guide , once that bear is hit , you are now in the rear and the guide is up front on the trail.
Why wouldn't you want that animal hit with the biggest head possible that will inflict the most significant damage possible?
I am a bit tired of the old saying that an expandable can fail
Hell!....I test fixed heads that fail far more in terms of percentages than those expandables which everyone tries to avoid like the plague
Whats the mind set here?
If an outfitter had a hair on his butt he would require that certain heads only be used and not types of heads.
That's what I am referring to when I say dumb ass outfitters
Here's what I am thinking
I am thinking that expandables are the said cure all for the inept and therefore they are used in larger number by said inept.
It is that lack of skill in large part and not the head that is the root cause of all these supposed wounds that get all the lip service.
I know a number of big outfitters who stand by their policy's and they will get all red faced and bent out of shape when I tell them this fact
But the anger is due to ignorance and a big dose of don't know Jack S... , which leaves them using examples of what they have seen as opposed to reasoning based on fact
Besides....it's not their butt crawling through the brush , follow a thin blood trail
Anyway.....Thanks for letting me vent